Login
Low-dose Estrogen Effective for Metastatic Breast Cancer
![]() |
|
Story originally posted on www.musclemagfitness.com Using estrogen-lowering drugs is a treatment method for controlling metastatic breast cancer. This breast cancer treat According to the research not only did estrogen treatment often stop breast cancer progression in 30 percent of women whose metastatic breast cancer no longer responded to standard anti-estrogen treatment, but in some patients metastatic breast cancer tumors became resensitized and again responded to anti-estrogen treatments. The results are reported in the Aug. 19, 2009, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. " "The women in the study had all experienced a relapse while on estrogen-lowering drugs, and their breast disease was progressing," says lead author Matthew J. Ellis, M.D., Ph.D., an oncologist with the Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University and Barnes-Jewish Hospital. "So they were faced with undergoing chemotherapy. We found that estrogen treatment stopped breast cancer progression in many patients and was much better tolerated than chemotherapy would have been." Sixty-six postmenopausal women with breast cancer that had spread beyond the breast participated in the study conducted by the Siteman Cancer Center with support by the University of Chicago, Case Western Reserve University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Duke University Medical Center. " All participants were originally diagnosed with estrogen receptor positive (ER ) breast tumors, meaning estrogen stimulated tumor growth. Seventy-five percent of breast cancer cases are ER . All participants had received aromatase inhibitor treatment, which severely lowers estrogen levels, but their metastatic tumors had later reappeared or resumed growing. The breast cancer study compared a high 30-milligram daily dose of estrogen to a low 6-milligram daily dose, and evaluated how well the treatments controlled the women's metastatic breast cancers and how the breast cancer treatments affected their quality of life. The high dose results in estrogen levels in the blood comparable to that of pregnant women, while the low dose gives estrogen levels similar to that of women who are ovulating, Ellis indicates. In both the high- and low-dose groups about 30 percent of participants experienced a clinical benefit - their tumors either shrank or stopped growing. Interestingly, the researchers demonstrated that they could predict fairly accurately which patients would have this positive response. They conducted standard positron emission tomography (PET) scans before estrogen treatment and 24 hours later. If metastatic tumors flared, or glowed more brightly, in the PET scans after estrogen was started, they were much more likely to be affected by estrogen therapy. In 80 percent of women with PET flare reactions, breast cancer tumors responded to estrogen therapy, and in 87 percent of women without PET flares, breast cancer tumors did not respond to estrogen. The participants filled out questionnaires to indicate whether they had adverse reactions to estrogen during the study. Adverse reactions could include headaches, bloating, breast tenderness, fluid retention, nausea and vomiting. Breast cancer patients receiving the high estrogen dose had more severe side effects. "The older women in the study were, the fewer estrogen-related symptoms they had," says Ellis also professor of medicine in the Division of Oncology. "But overall, we demonstrated clearly that the low dose was better tolerated than the high dose and was just as effective for controlling metastatic breast cancer." In the 30 percent of participants who responded to estrogen, breast cancer tumors often began to grow again after a period of months or years. But in a third of these recurring cases, the researchers showed that the women's tumors had become resensitized to anti-estrogen therapy. The breast cancer tumors shrank or stopped growing when the patients went back on their original aromatase inhibitor treatment. About 40,000 women die of metastatic breast cancer each year, and estrogen therapy could potentially help thousands of women with breast cancer, Dr. Ellis says. Furthermore, Ellis points out that the estrogen therapy is inexpensive, costing less than a dollar a day. |
Advancement in Cancer Detection: The Discovery of the Natural Killer Cell
In 1972, Jerry T. Thornthwaite presented a poster session with Professor, Dr. Bob Leif, at the annual Reticuloendothelial Society Meeting. The poster presented very unusual cells from the spleen (and later from the lymph nodes) of non-immunized mice that destroyed sheep red blood cells (SRBC) on contact. Thornthwaite came close to publishing the article in Science, but the conclusion proved it was more suitable for immunology journals and was later accepted.Defining the name of these cells was a challenge, but he was able to develop a way of enumerating them, determining density and enrichment in the linear bovine serum albumiin gradidents and study the morphology using light and scanning electrons. Years later, Dr. Thornthwaite developed a clinical application by in vitro enriching natural killer cells for infusion into patients. He investigated natural substances that were supposed to increase the natural killer cell response. Unlike complement mediated IgM antibody destruction of SRBC, which showed lyses of "plaques" of SRBC appearing as deflated balloons (Fig. 1), the complete destruction of the SRBC did not require prior immunization with SRBC or complement (Fig. 2). Thus, Thornthwaite gave them the name "complement independent plaque-forming cells" (CIPFC) or "rough lymphocyte plaque-forming cells" when he was able to perform scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Later, Heberman (1973) and Oldham (1973) used the term "Natural Killer Cell". |
|
![]() Click on picture to enlarge |
![]() Click on picture to enlarge |
Figures 1 and 2. Two IgM antibody-complement plaques showing the deflated SRBC in the plaque area (left) and the "rough surfaced" "complement independent-nonimmunized" plaques (right). |
|
In 1973, Thornthwaite developed a technique using alcian blue to stain cells that were dead prior to glutaraldehyde fixation. Viable cells, prior to glutaraldehyde fixation, did not stain. This technique was used to locate the Natural Killer Cell destroying target tumor cells. The killed tumor cells were also easy to see at the later stages by the blebbing of the membranes of the tumor cells (Fig. 3 and 4). |
|
![]() Click on picture to enlarge |
![]() Click on picture to enlarge |
Figures 3 and 4 showing Nomarski optics of the binding of complement independent cells (left) and cytoplasmic "blebbing" of the target mouse P815 plasmocytoma cells from lymph nodes of non-immunized mice. |
|
Working with Marilyn Cayer, they were able to section en face the alcian blue areas and perform electron microscopy. |
|
![]() Click on picture to enlarge |
|
Figure 5. CIPFC (Natural Killer Cell) destroying a target tumor cell. |
|
Natural Killer LymphocytesNatural killer (NK) cells are antigen nonspecific lymphocytes which recognize foreign cells of many different antigenic types. These cells are an important first line of defense against newly malignant cells and cells infected with viruses, bacteria, and protozoa (Natural Killer Cells). About 5 to 16 percent of the total lymphocyte population contains natural killer cells. NK cells have the ability to attack foreign cells without first having to recognize specific antigens. It has been proposed that NK cells complement cytotoxic T-cells by taking charge in situations where MHC class I expression is hindered through the effects of virus infection (Nature, 1995). NK cells have evolved a mechanism for mediating host defense against infection with viruses by having the ability to distinguish infected from uninfected cells. Although the exact mechanism is not clear at the present time, one possible mechanism may be that NK cells selectively kill target cells bearing low levels of MHC class I molecules on their surface. Natural killer cells have two types of surface receptor which aid in distinguishing infected from uninfected cells. An NK cell kills a target cell by releasing perforin (and other molecules) which damages the target cell membrane leading to death. NK cells also cause death by inducing apoptosis," the process of" programmed cell death, in the target. Natural killer (NK) cells are well known for their ability to kill certain tumors. However, it is now appreciated that NK cells have a significant role in host defense against invading pathogens, particularly intracellular organisms, and are capable of influencing the specific, acquired immune response. The ultimate goal of our work is to elucidate the function of NK cells in normal and abnormal immune responses and to derive targeted therapeutic interventions that influence these innate effector cells. |
|



ment approach is not always effective for women with metastatic 




